Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convention du Lac
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 04:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Convention du Lac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT. Sources don't prove notability and search yields minimal results. The event is now defunct so it is unlikely it will ever gain notability in the future. Gameinfirmary (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I only found one news reference to this, and it was an inclusion on a list of cons. While defunct doesn't equal delete (learned that on my own), this was not notable when it functioned. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete My search also turned up nothing in the way of significant third-party coverage of any kind. This blog describes the 2016 incarnation, which was the last, as still being a "small, growing convention", so I'm doubtful that it at any point attained enough of a presence to have the type of coverage we're looking for. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.