Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AHANA (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Boston College#AHANA. The Bushranger One ping only 00:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- AHANA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism coined by Boston College: has no acceptance in the broader world. Some minor mentions in articles, but fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG GrapedApe (talk) 02:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge (if applicable; to what?) and redirect: if it is an established term used by one large institution, it is worth keeping as a redirect, but notability-wise, it fails. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 03:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to existing AHANA section at Boston College page. Has some use outside of BC, but not enough to warrant its own article. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.